https://x.com/PatriotMarkCook/status/2109620983938076826

https://x.com/PatrickByrne/status/2109191135138607287

JUST IN: Stephen Miller says the "suppression polls" are designed to demoralize you into quitting before November 3.

Miller says Democrats fought Trump at every step. They sued to keep the border open, sued to block American energy, and fought tough-on-crime policies. 
He says they voted against tax cuts for families, the child tax credit, Trump accounts, and no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security.

Under Biden, inflation hit records. Miller says Trump tamed it faster than any advanced economy ever has, and his most favored nation drug pricing deals mean drug companies can't charge Americans more than foreign countries.

Don't let a poll tell you it's over. The fight isn't over until the votes are counted. Go vote.

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/2109089159054774536

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 12, 2026
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court to Hear Case Friday Over Whether Office of Elections Can Prevent Elections Commission From Meeting
HONOLULU — The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Friday, October 16, in Cushnie and McKay v. Nago, SCPW-26-0000498, a case brought by Hawaiʻi Elections Commissioners Ralph Cushnie and Tamara McKay concerning the Office of Elections’ refusal to provide administrative support needed for the Elections Commission to meet after its former chair’s term expired.
The case centers on HRS §11-1.5(b), which provides that the Office of Elections “shall provide staff support to the elections commission, as requested by the elections commission.” Cushnie and McKay requested the administrative support necessary to notice and convene a public Commission meeting. The Office of Elections refused, maintaining that the request lacked authorization through Commission action by majority vote.
That creates the central issue now before the Court: How can the Commission take a majority vote authorizing the support necessary to hold a meeting when it cannot hold the meeting without that support?
The Elections Commission has not assembled since the former chair’s term expired June 30, 2026.
The dispute has now expanded beyond simply arranging a meeting. A supplemental filing submitted to the Supreme Court on October 11 documents concerns that correspondence addressed to the Elections Commission has also not been distributed to commissioners.
In June 2024, the Elections Commission voted unanimously among participating members to require Commission-business correspondence to be shared with the Commission. It also separately voted 6–1 that communications and correspondence addressed to the Elections Commission be distributed to commissioners as received.
The new Supreme Court filing documents that a July 5email from Commissioner Jeffrey Osterkamp concerning the effort to convene the Commission was sent to the Commission's official email address but was not distributed to Cushnie and McKay through the Commission's correspondence process. Cushnie ultimately obtained the email through a public-records request.
On September 28, McKay asked Chief Election Officer Scott Nago and Office of Elections staff to explain whether correspondence sent to the Commission email address is distributed to commissioners, who receives it, who decides what is forwarded, and whether her correspondence since July 1 had been distributed. Cushnie separately requested that any undistributed Commission correspondence be provided to commissioners. As of October 11, the filing states that the commissioners had received neither a response nor Commission correspondence responsive to those requests.
The broader question is who controls whether Hawaiʻi's Elections Commission can function.
The Legislature created the Elections Commission to provide oversight of election administration, while requiring the Office of Elections to provide the Commission with staff support. An amicus filing by the Public Interest Legal Foundation argues that the Commission's dependence on OE for administrative support should not be interpreted as giving the Office authority to decide whether the Commission may assemble.
“This should be a simple question,” Cushnie said. “Can the Office of Elections withhold the administrative support necessary for the Elections Commission to meet and perform its oversight responsibilities? The Commission cannot exercise its authority if it cannot assemble, and it cannot effectively function if commissioners are not even receiving correspondence addressed to the Commission.”
Oral argument is scheduled for Friday, October 16, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. before the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court at Aliʻiōlani Hale in Honolulu.
Case: Cushnie and McKay v. Nago Supreme Court Case No.: SCPW-26-0000498 Oral Argument: Friday, October 16, 2026, 10:00 a.m. Location: Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, Aliʻiōlani Hale, Honolulu

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/2109670735509598547

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
FROM: THE COALITION
🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽