消息详情

I’m going to go out on a limb. Lots of people are still blaming Thune for this massive election loss. I disagree. I think he did exactly what Trump wanted. I know that’s a really hard “red pill” to swallow. Look at the bigger picture. What was Trump’s “mission” going into these midterms? This is something that should be easy to see “now.” I missed it BEFORE the midterms too. What did we miss? We didn’t suffer a massive “loss.” We actually witnessed a massive “victory.” When you understand Trump’s actual “mission,” you’ll see why our huge “loss” is temporary and now actually insures our final “victory.” Q drop 2961 Mar 04, 2019 4:13:05 PM EST Is there a benefit (think public optics) to allowing your enemy to open the FRONT DOOR? 'War-like' Posture Activated? Thank you for playing. Q We went from “too big to rig” in 2024, to “rigged too big” in 2026. And people blame Thune. Never mind the fact, that every time Thune’s name was mentioned in questions about the SAVE Act, Trump would compliment and defend him, instead of bashing him like he did Massie and other enemies. Here’s what most people can’t accept. Trump only needed the Senate to pass one bill. Do you remember the “Big Beautiful Bill?” That one big bill, accomplished exactly what Trump needed for his first two years. Massive tax cuts, to better help the American people survive the higher gas prices coming. Massive increases in spending on immigration and border security, including the hiring of way more border and ICE agents. Massive increase in military spending, to insure funding for the military conducting this war against the insurgency worldwide. It was all “front loaded.” That was the “tell.” When that bill passed, the democrats were finished. If Thune was really the enemy, that bill would never have passed. Not passing the SAVE Act turned it into a “narrative weapon.” By design. Trump used the SAVE Act to bludgeon the democrats and feed the narrative that democrats cheat in elections and that’s why they want open borders. At no point, did Trump seem panicked that it wasn’t passed or that it never got a vote. Why? Go back to the Q drop. “Is there a benefit (think public optics) to allowing your enemy to open the FRONT DOOR?” The “public optic” was that the SAVE Act wasn’t passed. That “allowed” the democrats to cheat. But they walked into the TRAP. “Rigged too big.” Why would the democrats cheat so big and make it so obvious? They had no choice. It was do or die time. Democrats needed to win both houses, to stop the FRAUD investigations and launch their own against Trump. Why would Trump want them to win? Why would a big blue tsunami election actually be very bad for democrats? Q drop 3596 Nov 15, 2019 1:38:28 PM EST What advantages might exist when you know the other sides playbook? merriam-webster.com/dictionary/TRAP Enjoy the show! Q Trump knew they would massively cheat, just like in 2020. What’s the difference between this election and 2020? 2020 focused on FRAUD in some “swing states.” 2026 was completely different. This election “exposed” FRAUD “nationwide.” Do you understand how important that difference really is? How do you “quickly” change the ENTIRE election system in “every state?” Now think about it. What’s the fastest way to transform the ENTIRE election “system” in every single state? Through a drawn out fight for years in each state legislature? Or expose the ENTIRE system to transform it at the “federal level?” If the SAVE Act had passed, the democrats would not have been able to cheat “nationwide.” Some races in red states, might have still been stolen, but nowhere near what we all witnessed in this election. Deep red states went completely blue and the democrats increased their vote totals by 20 million nationwide in a “midterm” election. You can’t tell people, you have to “show” them. Now the ENTIRE “system” has become a “national security” threat. Thank you for playing. https:/fixup/x.com/joelange/status/2119493571099119875

AI 助手

通知訊訊

相關消訊